us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 344 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2015
June 2015
 
(85%)
344 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
85 0 100 344

The editors liked

  • Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080
  • While the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
  • Efficient cooler
  • Back plate
  • Quiet fans
  • Excellent option for QHD gaming
  • Compact for a high-end card geared toward 4K gaming output
  • Runs quiet and cool
  • Thanks to bundled radiator and fan
  • Roughly matches Nvidia's GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 4K and high settings
  • Great Performance
  • Relatively Quiet
  • More Efficient Than Its Predecessors
  • Innovative Memory Technology
  • Competitive Pricing
  • Great performance
  • Competitive pricing
  • Bang-for-buck
  • Improved power efficiency over Radeon 300 series
  • Open-world
  • Gorgeous Visuals and impressive Graphics on PC
  • Polished PC Performance with Mod Support
  • Modern Combat is fun and engaging
  • All Current and Future DLC supported
  • Best performance
  •  excellent power consumption
  • Overclocking
  • Dead silent
  • Great performance at 4K
  • Low gaming noise
  • Compact form factor
  • Low temperatures
  • Power efficient gaming
  • HBM memory
  • Tons of bandwidth
  • Multi-monitor power consumption greatly improved
  • Backplate included
  • ZeroCore power
  • Dual-BIOS
  • Support for AMD FreeS
  • Performance is competitive with the GTX 980 Ti and AMD's HBM allows for a compact design that runs exceptionally cool and quiet with the bundled liquid cooler.
  • Excellent for HD and 1440p PC gaming
  • Superb cooling system
  • Very efficient design for minimized noise and heat
  • New Fiji processor
  • Compact design

The editors didn't like

  • Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter
  • Louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
  • Power
  • Overclocking
  • Size
  • Overall performance slides in just behind Nvidia's competing card
  • Especially at lower resolutions
  • Radiator complicates installation
  • Takes up space gained by smaller card
  • Lack of HDMI 2.0 port makes card an iffy choice for gaming on a 4K HDTV
  • Not A Clear Victory Over GeForce GTX 980 Ti
  • Competitive Pricing
  • But Still Kind Of Pricey
  • Only 2 board partner releases
  • HBM Memory not overclockable yet
  • Repetitive Side quests may get tedious
  • Linear gameplay at the end of the game
  • Story issues with pacing and confusing
  • Slower than expected in sub-4K resolutions
  • Pump emits permanent high-pitched whine
  • Some coil noise
  • Could be much quieter in idle
  • 4 GB of VRAM
  • Lack of HDMI 2.0
  • No memory overclocking
  • Radiator takes up extra space
  • No DVI / analog VGA outputs
  • Being out of stock online might be the Fury X's biggest obstacle
  • Though the GTX 980 Ti is a better value in raw price vs. performance
  • Especially if you overclock.
  • Not as powerful as it could be during 4K gameplay
  • Inferior to the GTX 980 Ti
  • Expensive relative to performance

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 11 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, Author: Régis , review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Performances dans les jeux, Ventilation discrète
  • Solution de watercooling peu pratique, Sifflement de la pompe, Overclocking très limité, HDMI 1.4 uniquement
  • Une carte graphique qui permet à AMD de remonter la moitié de la pente. Les performances sont là et la consommation électrique pas délirante, mais c'est tout. L'écart face à la concurrence n'est absolument pas creusé et le système de refroidissement reten...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-11-06, Author: Florian , review by: notebookcheck.it

  • Abstract:  Ciao single player, ciao Battaglia Reale. Activision e Treyarch hanno saltato sul carro di Battle Royale, sviluppando Black Ops 4 come gioco multiplayer e abbandonando una campagna basata sulla storia che è stata una caratteristica di tutti i precedenti g...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.it

  • Abstract:  È passato oltre un anno da quando AMD ha presentato la Radeon R9 295X2, una scheda di fascia "ultra high end" con due GPU Hawaii su un solo PCB. A differenza della Radeon HD 6990 e della HD 7990, quella scheda era raffreddata piuttosto bene. Il segreto de...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, Author: Paolo , review by: hwupgrade.it

  • Al termine di questa lunga analisi prestazionale una via rapida per meglio inquadrare i livelli di prestazioni che abbiamo ottenuto con queste schede nei titoli inseriti a confronto, e con le impostazioni qualitative selezionate, è quella di generare un g...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, review by: pcproffesionale.it

  • Abstract:  Presentata alla stampa pochi giorni fa durante l'E3, oggi debutta in pubblico la nuova ammiraglia delle schede grafiche targate Amd: si tratta della Radeon R9 Fury X. In questa breve anteprima vi presentiamo i primi dettagli del prodotto che rappresenta u...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, Author: Vittorio , review by: nexthardware.com

  • Non possiamo che apprezzare gli sforzi compiuti da AMD con la Radeon R9 Fury X, una scheda che rappresenta un pietra miliare per il settore grazie all'introduzione delle nuove memorie HBM. Le prestazioni sono assolutamente solide anche con i titoli che s...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2015-06-19, Author: Manolo , review by: tomshw.it

  • Abstract:  Quali sono le prestazioni di una nuova scheda video AMD Radeon R9 Fury X ? Le recensioni dei siti specializzati sono coperte da "NDA" (non-disclosure agreement, accordo di non divulgazione) fino al 24 giugno, ma una prima impressione generale si può otten...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-06-19, Author: Manolo , review by: tomshw.it

  • Abstract:  Quali sono le prestazioni di una nuova scheda video AMD Radeon R9 Fury X ? Le recensioni dei siti specializzati sono coperte da "NDA" (non-disclosure agreement, accordo di non divulgazione) fino al 24 giugno, ma una prima impressione generale si può otten...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-04-17, review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Abstract:  Technisch setzt Anno 1800 auf die Engine-Basis der jüngsten Vorgänger, allerdings wurde diese überarbeitet und an vielen Stellen erweitert, darunter fällt vor allem die Detaildarstellung. Zu den Engine-Erweiterungen zählt außerdem die DirectX-12-Schnittst...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-10-18, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  Sechs Monate war Dirt Rally als Early-Access-Titel zugänglich, jetzt ist die finale Version im Handel erschienen. Der Titel kehrt zu den Wurzeln der Serie zurück: Das Fahren von anspruchsvollen Rallyeetappen steht im Fokus. Und die Technik...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 11 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×