us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 269 expert reviews of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 92%. Scroll down and see all reviews for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2012
March 2012
 
(92%)
269 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
92 0 100 269

The editors liked

  • Extremely quiet
  • NVIDIA 3D Vision 2
  • Low power consumption
  • GPU Boost
  • 1006MHz stock clock with headroom for more performance tuning
  • Low temperature
  • Adaptive VSync
  • Full sized HDMI port
  • 6GB Memory Data Rate
  • PCIE 3.0
  • This card has a 1GHz base clock speed and a high memory bandwidth
  • Amazingly power efficient. Excellent performance. Reduced profile. Supports four monitors
  • 3D Vision Surround on one card. Requires only six-pin PCIe power connectors.
  • Great Performance
  • Relatively Cool and Quiet
  • TXAA
  • 3D Surround From a Single Card
  • Bests AMD's Radeon HD 7970 on most tests while using less power
  • Dynamic core clock speed helps card adapt to different games and tasks
  • Priced below AMD's competing card
  • Supports four monitors
  • Fantastic Performance
  • Energy Efficient and quiet
  • 16% performance increase over GTX 580
  • Reasonable price
  • Massive leap forward in energy efficiency
  • Dynamic overclocking works well
  • Good additional OC potential
  • Native full-size HDMI & DisplayPort output
  • Adds adaptive VSync and new Anti-Aliasing modes

The editors didn't like

  • None that I could honestly think of
  • There are vast improvements when compared to the prior generation of NVIDIA DirectX 11 Video cards
  • HiTech Legion Editors Choice Award
  • Discuss this review in our forums
  • The GTX 680 only has one HDMI connection
  • Not always appreciably faster than competing AMD card. Blocks an expansion slot. Requires a hefty power supply
  • Expensive (Although Priced aggresively)
  • Additional Considerations for Overclockers
  • Still pricey
  • Less onboard memory than comparable AMD cards
  • Expensive
  • Dynamic OC can't be turned off
  • Manual overclocking more complicated than before
  • Noisy in 3D
  • Voltage controller has no software voltage control neither monitoring
  • No technology similar to AMD's ZeroCore power
  • 500 MHz max OC and power limit won't work

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-04-16, review by: pcworld.com_techhive.com

  • Fantastic Performance, Energy Efficient and quiet
  • Expensive
  • If you're the kind of enthusiast gamer who will spend $500 on a graphics card, this is the one to buy....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-04-10, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Running a pair of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680's in 2-way SLI Surround helped boost our performance by 63% on average at a resolution of 5760x1080! ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-09, review by: Behardware.com

  • With this first Kepler generation GPU, the GK104, NVIDIA's main objective was to revisit as far as possible the overly weak energy yield on the Fermi generation, which was probably becoming increasingly difficult to manage. This objective has successfu...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-05, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Running a pair of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680's in 2-way SLI took our Ultra HD gaming on the Dell 30-inch display to the next level by running everything at acceptable frame rates! ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-04, review by: hardocp.com

  • One thing is certain after our overclocking, the default GPU Boost settings are not the highest frequency the GeForce GTX 680 is capable of. The GPU frequency can certainly be improved by manual overclocking. There is a bit of headroom yet to be had with...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-02, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  When we first reviewed the GeForce GTX 680, we were in our usual rush to push out an article at the time of the product's unveiling, after a solid week of poking and prodding Nvidia's new GPU. We were also attempting some of the more complex analysis of r...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-30, review by: hardocp.com

  • Abstract:  This discussion comes up in the [H]ardForum quite often. People know that these big tech companies supply the online review community with a "reviewer's guide." Many of our readers have always asked what exactly is in these guides; what exactly do the gui...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-28, review by: hardocp.com

  • It all comes down to pricing and performance, and you'll find that on both price and performance GeForce GTX 680 SLI wins. GeForce GTX 680 MSRP is $499, and the Radeon HD 7970 is $549. When you throw two of these video cards into the mix the difference co...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-03-25, review by: en.expreview.com

  • Perfect Cost PerformanceGTX 680 retakes the performance crown now, in 3DMark 11 theoretically test, the card has a stronger performance than HD 7970 with improvement of over 20% in P and X mode. In actual games, there are three items lagging behind, ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-23, Author: Matt , review by: computershopper.com

  • Bests AMD's Radeon HD 7970 on most tests while using less power, Dynamic core clock speed helps card adapt to different games and tasks, Priced below AMD's competing card, Supports four monitors
  • Still pricey, Less onboard memory than comparable AMD cards
  • Nvidia's 2012 flagship card may not top AMD's HD 7970 in every game or benchmark test, but it won or came close in every one we ran. It's also priced $50 less than AMD's competing card and uses much less power under load. It's more muscle than most gamer...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 3 of 27 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×