us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 269 expert reviews of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 92%. Scroll down and see all reviews for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2012
March 2012
 
(92%)
269 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
92 0 100 269

The editors liked

  • Extremely quiet
  • NVIDIA 3D Vision 2
  • Low power consumption
  • GPU Boost
  • 1006MHz stock clock with headroom for more performance tuning
  • Low temperature
  • Adaptive VSync
  • Full sized HDMI port
  • 6GB Memory Data Rate
  • PCIE 3.0
  • This card has a 1GHz base clock speed and a high memory bandwidth
  • Amazingly power efficient. Excellent performance. Reduced profile. Supports four monitors
  • 3D Vision Surround on one card. Requires only six-pin PCIe power connectors.
  • Great Performance
  • Relatively Cool and Quiet
  • TXAA
  • 3D Surround From a Single Card
  • Bests AMD's Radeon HD 7970 on most tests while using less power
  • Dynamic core clock speed helps card adapt to different games and tasks
  • Priced below AMD's competing card
  • Supports four monitors
  • Fantastic Performance
  • Energy Efficient and quiet
  • 16% performance increase over GTX 580
  • Reasonable price
  • Massive leap forward in energy efficiency
  • Dynamic overclocking works well
  • Good additional OC potential
  • Native full-size HDMI & DisplayPort output
  • Adds adaptive VSync and new Anti-Aliasing modes

The editors didn't like

  • None that I could honestly think of
  • There are vast improvements when compared to the prior generation of NVIDIA DirectX 11 Video cards
  • HiTech Legion Editors Choice Award
  • Discuss this review in our forums
  • The GTX 680 only has one HDMI connection
  • Not always appreciably faster than competing AMD card. Blocks an expansion slot. Requires a hefty power supply
  • Expensive (Although Priced aggresively)
  • Additional Considerations for Overclockers
  • Still pricey
  • Less onboard memory than comparable AMD cards
  • Expensive
  • Dynamic OC can't be turned off
  • Manual overclocking more complicated than before
  • Noisy in 3D
  • Voltage controller has no software voltage control neither monitoring
  • No technology similar to AMD's ZeroCore power
  • 500 MHz max OC and power limit won't work

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, review by: neoseeker.com

  • Is the GTX 680 a HD 7970 killer? The short answer to this is yes, but as with most things a full response would not be as black and white. When it comes down to performance, the GTX 680 is between 10% to 15% faster across the board compared to the HD 7...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • With a tremendous amount of information now under our belts, we can boil things down, almost cruelly, to a few simple results in a final couple of scatter plots. First up is our overall performance index, in terms of average FPS across all of the games w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Nvidia’s response to AMD’s recent advances is quite a success. Based on the GK104 processor with the new Kepler architecture, the GeForce GTX 680 graphics card has proved to be somewhat faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7970 across all the tests. It is al...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, Author: Matthew , review by: pcmag.com

  • Amazingly power efficient. Excellent performance. Reduced profile. Supports four monitors, 3D Vision Surround on one card. Requires only six-pin PCIe power connectors.
  • Not always appreciably faster than competing AMD card. Blocks an expansion slot. Requires a hefty power supply
  • Nvidia has introduced some impressive innovations in its new single-GPU flagship card, the GeForce GTX 680. Hard-core PC gamers shouldn't expect down-the-board AMD-crushing frame rates, but reduced power bills are a distinct possibility....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, review by: hothardware.com

  • Great Performance, Relatively Cool and Quiet, GPU Boost, Adaptive VSync, TXAA, 3D Surround From a Single Card
  • Expensive (Although Priced aggresively), Additional Considerations for Overclockers
  • The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Reference CardThe NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 is full of all kinds on win. Despite using fewer transistors, having a smaller die, and consuming less power, the GeForce GTX 680 is faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7970 overall. The GK104...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, review by: techpowerup.com

  • 16% performance increase over GTX 580, Reasonable price, Massive leap forward in energy efficiency, Dynamic overclocking works well, Good additional OC potential, Native full-size HDMI & DisplayPort output, Adds adaptive VSync and new Anti-Aliasing modes,
  • Dynamic OC can't be turned off, Manual overclocking more complicated than before, Noisy in 3D, Voltage controller has no software voltage control neither monitoring, No technology similar to AMD's ZeroCore power, 500 MHz max OC and power limit won't work
  • NVIDIA clearly has a winner on their hands with the GTX 680. The new card, which is based on NVIDIA's GK104 graphics processor, that introduces the Kepler architecture, is a significant leap forward both in terms of performance and GPU technology. Tech...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, review by: lanoc.org

  • and FVWhen NVidia invited me out to check out what they had been working on I was excited but unsure of what to expect. They had been very quiet about what to expect up until that point. After getting the full breakdown their and heading home to put t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, review by: overclock3d.net

  • So much to cover, so little time.There are two sides to the GTX680. On the one hand there is the elements that we can test right now, and will make a difference to the average person, and on the other we have the wealth of features that are an attempt to...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • We’ve said from the very first time we laid out hands on a 28nm GPU that you’d be foolish to rush into a high-end GPU purchase without waiting to see what the competition had to offer, and boy has it been worth the wait. While not superior in every tes...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(92%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-21, Author: Jake , review by: pureoverclock.com

  • The simple fact right up front here is that Kepler improves upon Fermi in every regard, from performance and power consumption, to features and software. On the surface it may not seem significantly different; after all, the GeForce GTX 680 doesn't loo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 5 of 27 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×