us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 269 expert reviews of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 92%. Scroll down and see all reviews for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2012
March 2012
 
(92%)
269 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
92 0 100 269

The editors liked

  • Extremely quiet
  • NVIDIA 3D Vision 2
  • Low power consumption
  • GPU Boost
  • 1006MHz stock clock with headroom for more performance tuning
  • Low temperature
  • Adaptive VSync
  • Full sized HDMI port
  • 6GB Memory Data Rate
  • PCIE 3.0
  • This card has a 1GHz base clock speed and a high memory bandwidth
  • Amazingly power efficient. Excellent performance. Reduced profile. Supports four monitors
  • 3D Vision Surround on one card. Requires only six-pin PCIe power connectors.
  • Great Performance
  • Relatively Cool and Quiet
  • TXAA
  • 3D Surround From a Single Card
  • Bests AMD's Radeon HD 7970 on most tests while using less power
  • Dynamic core clock speed helps card adapt to different games and tasks
  • Priced below AMD's competing card
  • Supports four monitors
  • Fantastic Performance
  • Energy Efficient and quiet
  • 16% performance increase over GTX 580
  • Reasonable price
  • Massive leap forward in energy efficiency
  • Dynamic overclocking works well
  • Good additional OC potential
  • Native full-size HDMI & DisplayPort output
  • Adds adaptive VSync and new Anti-Aliasing modes

The editors didn't like

  • None that I could honestly think of
  • There are vast improvements when compared to the prior generation of NVIDIA DirectX 11 Video cards
  • HiTech Legion Editors Choice Award
  • Discuss this review in our forums
  • The GTX 680 only has one HDMI connection
  • Not always appreciably faster than competing AMD card. Blocks an expansion slot. Requires a hefty power supply
  • Expensive (Although Priced aggresively)
  • Additional Considerations for Overclockers
  • Still pricey
  • Less onboard memory than comparable AMD cards
  • Expensive
  • Dynamic OC can't be turned off
  • Manual overclocking more complicated than before
  • Noisy in 3D
  • Voltage controller has no software voltage control neither monitoring
  • No technology similar to AMD's ZeroCore power
  • 500 MHz max OC and power limit won't work

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 7 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-08-28, Author: Ryan , review by: eteknix.com

  • Abstract:  Just over a month ago we published our AMD driver analysis article looking at the progress two generations of AMD flagship GPUs, the HD 7970 and R9 290X, had made with driver updates. We compared each flagship card's launch drivers to the latest drivers a...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-03-12, Author: Hiwa , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  A gamer simply can't get enough graphics power in their rig, which makes the upgrade question omnipresent. To show you whether it makes sense to upgrade from one generation to another we created this series of articles, where we will compare graphics card...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-28, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  It hasn't been a long time that Unigine Corporation released a new version of their Heaven benchmark. One day after that, they showed a new benchmark: Unigine Valley 1.0. The developer team behind which has its roots in Siberia, found inspiration in their...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-25, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  A few days ago we introduced you to the concept of of frametime tests , a more accurate way of gauging graphics card performance in video games. Today we are applying the new test for the first time, and with the new data we will compare the AMD Radeon...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Today Futuremark released a new version of its popular 3DMark benchmarking software, which has been part of the standard Hardware.Info tests since the first version appeared in 1999. Futuremark seems to be taking a cue from Apple with the name this time...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-22, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Two graphics cards, ten processors, ten benchmarks If you like playing games in Full HD resolution with all fancy graphical effects enabled, you obviously need to invest in a high-end graphics card. If you're looking at buying one of the current high-end...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-03, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  When we review a new graphics card on Hardware.Info and list the benchmark results, the charts also include other cards from the current and previous generation to put things in perspective. We typically don't go back further in time to avoid clutter, b...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-24, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  nVidias GeForce GTX 680 the fastest single GPU graphics card on the planet? Bitch Please! Here we go again, a good old fashioned ATI/AMD vs nVidia like we all love to see. So here's the thing: using latest drivers we're going to show you which is todays f...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-24, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  In this article we are going to show you how well - or not - multi GPU setups scale in recent games. On 14 pages we are going to show you the performance of two GTX 680, two Radeon HD 7970 and two Radeon HD 7950 in theoretical benchmarks as well as state ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-16, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  In this article we are going to analyse two things: first the clock per clock performance between the GTX 670 and GTX 680 both clocked at 1 GHz. To do so we have bypassed the GPU Boost so the graphics cards have a minimum and maximum clock frequency of 1 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 7 of 27 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×