us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 275 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2017
June 2017
 
(88%)
275 Reviews
Users
(98%)
62 Reviews
88 0 100 275

The editors liked

  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Ryzen platform is very stable now
  • 6-cores
  • 12-threads
  • Fully unlocked
  • Comes with CPU cooler
  • Great performance compared to Intel's i5-8400
  • Low price
  • Bundled cooler
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Six cores and 12 threads for half the price of Intel's similarly outfitted Core i7-6800K
  • Consistently topped pricier Core i7-7700K on tests that take advantage of all available cores
  • Cooler included in the box (unlike with the Ryzen 5 1600X)
  • Beats Intel 7500 and Intel 7600K in multi-threaded apps
  • Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack)
  • Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation
  • Heatsink included
  • Platform updated to incl
  • Comes With SMT Which Core i5 CPUs Lack
  • Outstanding Performance
  • Fully Unlocked
  • Can Easily Be OC'd to 4Ghz+
  • Perfect For Multi-Tasking
  • Future-Proof Platform
  • Great Price/Performance Value
  • Runs Very Cool

The editors didn't like

  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Gaming performance still lacks
  • Single-threaded performance is still behind Intel
  • Performance in lightly threaded applications
  • Memory overclocking
  • 1080p gaming and single-core performance still lag behind comparable "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips
  • Higher power draw than Intel CPUs
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Boost frequency significantly lower than on R
  • Memory Compatibility Limited

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 24 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-07-11, Author: 贾晓边 , review by: pconline.com.cn

  • Abstract:  【PConline 杂谈】 距离8代酷睿发布已经过了大半年的时间,虽然8代酷睿上市之初价格虚高,但着供货量稳定8代酷睿价格逐渐走低,也因此Inte终于摆脱了7代酷睿对上锐龙的颓势,但是我们还注意到8代酷睿有一款i3价格依然处于1200块这个比较高的价位,按照我们以往的认知1000块以上应该是i5是价格领域,那么今天大家就随作者PConline晓边一起来看看这个高达1200人民币的i3究竟值不值。首先就是我们的文章的主角i3-8350K,i3-8350K为四核四线程设计,至于他价格为何这么高...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-06-25, Author: 流云 , review by: mydrivers.com

  • 五、总结:多核大势所趋 6核12线程仍是主流从奔腾4时代开始,CPU遭遇了频率提升瓶颈,增加核心数量成为了提升处理器性能的主要手段。在可预见的未来,A/I在处理器领域进行的核战争会愈加猛烈。从前面的测试可以知,在多任务,游戏直播、渲染等方面,3.8GHz的锐龙5 1600要比i5-8400强30%以上。而在游戏方面两者也完全持平并且在游戏多开或者同时运行其他程序时候的游戏表现,AMD锐龙5 1600更胜一筹。在功耗方面,锐龙的表现相当优秀,12线程的锐龙5 1600拷机功耗比6线程的i5-8400还要低。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-16, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  年末已至,更多的商家都摩拳擦掌竞相推出更多的促销,力图在硬件市场获得年终的收官之战中取得好成绩。而且《绝地求生:大逃杀》仍然刺激的更多的玩家加入战团。这两个强大因素促使了玩家们纷纷开启了装机模式,这里我谈到了整机装机,今年最为风光的当属AMD锐龙处理器,其优质的性能帮助AMD占领今年市场的大部分份额,而对手Intel也不甘寂寞品全新推出第八代酷睿,更多的核心,更高频率让玩家们有了更多选择。广大玩家一定对于主流的锐龙以及全新酷睿充满了更多的期待,我们今天特地针对玩家们非常喜爱的锐龙5 1600 与 i5-8...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-15, Author: 兽王 , review by: pconline.com.cn

  • AMD Ryzen 5 1600电商价格读取中. 综合对比下来,两者孰优孰劣已经超明显了,除了部分单线程性能以外,拥有多线程优势的Ryzen 5 1600几乎是全方位碾压i5-8400的,这也在意料之内。而且线程数量的增多,对于任何用户的体验来说,都是非常有好处的,举个例子,大多数人使用电脑的时候,后台进程都不止一个,你可能在玩游戏的同时会听着歌、挂着QQ、还随时打开几个浏览器页面,甚至还打开着视频播放器,这种应用场景下,线程越多,就越能轻松地应付。Intel Core i5-8400电商价格读取中...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-08, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Ryzen 5 1600大幅度强于酷睿i5 7500处理器,所以,综合各种条件之后,其实Ryzen 5 1600会是本次对比中最值得推荐的产品,无论是性能、功耗、发热还是综合平台的价格,都非常给力。以上就是脚本之家小编为大家带来的酷睿i5-7500对比AMD R5-1600性能评测了,希望可以帮助到大家,大家如果还有疑问的话,可以在下方的评论框内给我们留言哦。我们会尽自己所能的为大家解答。谢谢大家一如既往的支持,也请大家继续关注脚本之家的后续教程和软件。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-07, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • 测试结果很明显了,Ryzen 5 1600得益于六核十二线程,打败只有4核心i3-8350K处理器,性能差距在33%左右。除此之外,Ryzen 5 1600在远强于i3-8350K的情况下,发热和功耗控制都比i3-8350K好,而它们两者价格也比较相近,甚至如果把主板价格综合考虑进去的话,Ryzen 5 1600的平台总成本比i3-8350K还要低不少。以上就是脚本之家小编为大家带来的i3-8350K与R5-1600性能区别对比评测了,希望可以帮助到大家,大家如果还有疑问的话,可以在下方的评论框内给我们留...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-07, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Ryzen 5 1400和Ryzen 5 1600相比的话,总体综合性能在35%左右,这也算对得起600元的价格差距,所以这两款处理器表现均非常出色,均是那个价位的首选产品之一。以上就是脚本之家小编为大家带来的R5-1400与R5-1600性能对比评测教程了,希望可以帮助到大家,大家如果还有疑问的话,可以在下方的评论框内给我们留言哦。我们会尽自己所能的为大家解答。谢谢大家一如既往的支持,也请大家继续关注脚本之家的后续教程和软件。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-06, Author: 兽王 , review by: pconline.com.cn

  • 测试结果很明显了,Ryzen 5 1600得益于6核12线程,打败只有4核心的几款i3和i5简直太轻松了。除此之外,Ryzen 5 1600在远强于i3-8350K的情况下,发热和功耗控制都比i3-8350K好,而它们两者价格也比较相近,甚至如果把主板价格综合考虑进去的话,Ryzen 5 1600的平台总成本比i3-8350K还要低不少。同理,Ryzen 5 1400和i3-8100、i5-7500相比的话,也是Ryzen 5 1400性能表现更好,而且多线程的泛用性会更广。AMD Ryzen 5 160...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-10-10, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 通过以上的测试,在游戏表现中,CPU的影响十分小,性能差距不大。虽然CPU单核性能比较的时候,i7-6700K完胜,但是Ryzen 5 1600在多线程领域占据了比较大的优势,在视频渲染中占了较大优势,表现力较佳。...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-03, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Intel:Intel的目前来说总体性能会低于AMD的同级别的产品,能耗比i5-7500表现尚可,但是7700K的能耗比表现比较感人。主要的优势是单线程性能和包含集显。AMD:近十年来AMD几乎是第一次达到比较普遍的性能压制Intel,同时能耗比控制也做的较好,1700是较为突出的代表,不过受制于目前的显卡市场,不带集显的规格存在一定的硬伤。总体来说目前AMD CPU产品终于是回到了正常的竞争水平,产品上也表现出较好的竞争力。Intel这边目前还是较为混乱(X299实在不敢恭维),相信在8系列酷睿上线之后...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 24 of 28 « Previous   1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×