us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 422 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(85%)
422 Reviews
Users
(90%)
12 Reviews
85 0 100 422

The editors liked

  • Great Multi Thread performance
  • Solid Gaming Performance
  • Nice Overclocking room on 1700
  • Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
  • Price
  • Power Efficiency
  • Experience
  • Eight cores and 16 threads at half the price of Intel
  • Excellent performance in workstation applications
  • AM4 is a modern
  • Full-featured platform
  • While only a small performance boost
  • XFR is zero-effort and works well
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • 8-Cores / 16-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Huge performance leap over previous-generation AMD FX processors
  • Trades blows with Intel's Core i7-6900K at half the price
  • Very price-aggressive motherboard options
  • AMD processors are competitive again
  • Outstanding performance in heavy multi-threaded apps
  • Cheaper than Intel HEDT processors
  • Single-threaded performance improved
  • Low power draw and excellent power efficiency
  • Platform updated to include latest feature
  • Performance
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool

The editors didn't like

  • Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
  • Gaming performance is weak compared to Intel
  • Particularly in modern titles
  • Specialised AVX applications will perform better under Intel
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks
  • Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • Requires dedicated graphics card
  • Single-core performance lags behind competing Intel "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Chipsets don't have as many PCI Express/SATA ports as Intel's offerings
  • Gaming performance at 1080p lags behind Intel
  • At least for now
  • Horrible motherboards / BIOS
  • Feels not ready for market
  • Limited game performance
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Overclocking barely worth it
  • Requires optimized
  • Overclocking
  • Not really cons
  • But the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 43
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-04-16, Author: Tomas , review by: hw4all.com

  • According to the comparison results in most games we can see a slight difference in the results between the processors AMD Ryzen 7 1800X and Intel Core i7-7700K. No surprises in the form of AMD is no advantage, except for CPU tests 3DMark. In real Core i7...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Well, the Ryzen 7 launch has a surprising amount of excitement and drama mixed together with the impressive numbers but with memory issues and game performance causing very polarized opinions on social media and on websites like Reddit. AMD fans even...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com

  • We have already shown in previous reviews that the Zen microarchitecture from AMD is around the equivalent of Intel's Broadwell microarchitecture, but at this lower price point we have AMD's Zen against Intel's Kaby Lake, which is two generations newer th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-04, Author: Silvio , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • Ryzen 7 vs. IntelIt is certainly not an easy task to classify the Ryzen CPUs. The octa-core chips convince with dream results in the synthetic benchmarks and even beat much more expensive rivals with ease.However, we cannot give a full recommendation, bec...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-30, Author: Dave , review by: hothardware.com

  • In our initial review of the Ryzen 7 series processors, we saw much lower than expected performance from AMD's new processor line-up than we did with Intel's in the DirectX 12-based Ashes Of The Singularity benchmark. This was especially prominent when te...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-29, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  This week MSI finally released an updated BIOS for the X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM that we've been using for a majority of our Ryzen Linux benchmarks. With that motherboard improving memory compatibility and allowing us to finally run the board at higher...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-20, Author: Josh , review by: pureoverclock.com

  • Great Multi Thread performance, Solid Gaming Performance, Nice Overclocking room on 1700, Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master, Price, Power Efficiency, Experience
  • Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
  • Don't let negative vibes fool you. AMD has released an excellent design that far surpasses what the release was like of the FX-8350 years ago. If it wasn't for Ryzen 5, I'd tell everyone to get a Ryzen 7 1700. If you can use 8 cores though, you should...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-17, Author: W1zzard , review by: techpowerup.com

  • AMD processors are competitive again, Outstanding performance in heavy multi-threaded apps, Cheaper than Intel HEDT processors, Single-threaded performance improved, Low power draw and excellent power efficiency, Platform updated to include latest feature
  • Horrible motherboards / BIOS, feels not ready for market, Limited game performance, Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited, Setup complicated (memory, HPET, CCX, SMT, and power profile), Overclocking barely worth it, Requires optimized
  • The AMD Ryzen 7 1800X currently retails for $499. AMD processors are competitive again Outstanding performance in heavy multi-threaded apps Cheaper than Intel HEDT processors Single-threaded performance improved Low power draw and excellent power effi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(86%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-16, Author: AMD , review by: neoseeker.com

  • This is my first trio CPU review, and the anticipation was palpable leading up to their arrival on my test bench! The fact that this was also the introduction of a new processor lineup from AMD made things even more intriguing.Some minor issues were overc...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-10, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  For the last decade, every Intel processor review used the previous generation Intel processor as the primary point of reference, because AMD couldn't compete. With Ryzen, all of that changes. The Ryzen 7 1800X isn't the second coming of the Athlon 64, bu...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 43 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 43   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×