us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 422 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(85%)
422 Reviews
Users
(90%)
12 Reviews
85 0 100 422

The editors liked

  • Great Multi Thread performance
  • Solid Gaming Performance
  • Nice Overclocking room on 1700
  • Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
  • Price
  • Power Efficiency
  • Experience
  • Eight cores and 16 threads at half the price of Intel
  • Excellent performance in workstation applications
  • AM4 is a modern
  • Full-featured platform
  • While only a small performance boost
  • XFR is zero-effort and works well
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • 8-Cores / 16-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Huge performance leap over previous-generation AMD FX processors
  • Trades blows with Intel's Core i7-6900K at half the price
  • Very price-aggressive motherboard options
  • AMD processors are competitive again
  • Outstanding performance in heavy multi-threaded apps
  • Cheaper than Intel HEDT processors
  • Single-threaded performance improved
  • Low power draw and excellent power efficiency
  • Platform updated to include latest feature
  • Performance
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool

The editors didn't like

  • Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
  • Gaming performance is weak compared to Intel
  • Particularly in modern titles
  • Specialised AVX applications will perform better under Intel
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks
  • Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • Requires dedicated graphics card
  • Single-core performance lags behind competing Intel "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Chipsets don't have as many PCI Express/SATA ports as Intel's offerings
  • Gaming performance at 1080p lags behind Intel
  • At least for now
  • Horrible motherboards / BIOS
  • Feels not ready for market
  • Limited game performance
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Overclocking barely worth it
  • Requires optimized
  • Overclocking
  • Not really cons
  • But the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 43
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-03-06, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  Our latest Ryzen Linux benchmarks are looking at the impact of the CPUFreq scaling driver's governors have on the performance of the Ryzen 7 1800X, including a look at the power consumption and performance-per-Watt when changing the governors.ACPI CPUFreq...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-04, Author: stefan , review by: madshrimps.be

  • After finalizing the tests with the Ryzen 7 1800X and comparing with the Intel counterparts we can finally draw a conclusion regarding its performance: the new AMD competitor offers enough performance in order to beat the Core i7 6900K in rendering and vi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-04, Author: Tomas , review by: hw4all.com

  • Test new CPU was interesting, because we have not just a 10% increase, as it did in the case of test Core i7-7700K. AMD successfully launched on the market a new architecture and new processors to compete with Intel. Increase productivity RYZEN compared t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-03, Author: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net

  • performance, power consumption, value
  • overclocking
  • AMD launched a new CPU generation after a long time using a totally new architecture. To be honest everyone is expecting Ryzen from at least 4 years, but AMD cooked it slowly and it is obvious they did a great job afterall.Ryzen 7 1800X is an 8-core / 16-...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(94%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • Intel has enjoyed relatively unchallenged occupancy of the enthusiast CPU market for several years now. If you mark the FX-8350 as the last major play prior to subsequent refreshes, that marks the last major AMD CPU launch as 2012. Of course, later launc...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Ron , review by: modders-inc.com

  • Abstract:  Many things in life are best done quickly. Tearing out a bandage, asking somebody out you had a crush on for a while, etc. but buying a high-end CPU is not one of them. Buying a high-end CPU is an investment with expectations that it will run for many yea...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: ATMINSIDE , review by: overclockers.com

  • At launch we already see quite a few nice motherboards on the market, including the GIGABYTE AX370-GAMING 5 used here. Over 80 motherboards are available as of today for the AM4 platform, don't forget these will also support the upcoming Ryzen-based APU...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • It's been a long time coming, but AMD Ryzen is here and it looks impressive. Though we only have the Ryzen 7 1800X in our results today I am eager to get back home and get to testing the 1700X and 1700 models and see if they offer as compelling of an alte...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Mark , review by: arstechnica.com

  • Eight cores and 16 threads at half the price of Intel, Excellent performance in workstation applications, AM4 is a modern, full-featured platform, While only a small performance boost, XFR is zero-effort and works well
  • Gaming performance is weak compared to Intel, particularly in modern titles, Specialised AVX applications will perform better under Intel

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Man, there is just so much to take in with this launch. I've gone through the testing and even though I have to follow up (hopefully) later on today when our 1700 comes in with its performance. I can say that testing Ryzen as a whole has been a roller...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 43 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 43   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×