us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 422 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(85%)
422 Reviews
Users
(90%)
12 Reviews
85 0 100 422

The editors liked

  • Great Multi Thread performance
  • Solid Gaming Performance
  • Nice Overclocking room on 1700
  • Easy clock adjustment with Ryzen Master
  • Price
  • Power Efficiency
  • Experience
  • Eight cores and 16 threads at half the price of Intel
  • Excellent performance in workstation applications
  • AM4 is a modern
  • Full-featured platform
  • While only a small performance boost
  • XFR is zero-effort and works well
  • Remarkable multithreaded performance
  • More core and threads than the competition
  • 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming
  • The full-featured AM4 platform
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong Overall Performance
  • 8-Cores / 16-Threads
  • Power Friendly
  • Aggressive Pricing
  • Huge performance leap over previous-generation AMD FX processors
  • Trades blows with Intel's Core i7-6900K at half the price
  • Very price-aggressive motherboard options
  • AMD processors are competitive again
  • Outstanding performance in heavy multi-threaded apps
  • Cheaper than Intel HEDT processors
  • Single-threaded performance improved
  • Low power draw and excellent power efficiency
  • Platform updated to include latest feature
  • Performance
  • Power consumption
  • Value
  • Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool

The editors didn't like

  • Near Heart Attack levels of Excitement
  • Gaming performance is weak compared to Intel
  • Particularly in modern titles
  • Specialised AVX applications will perform better under Intel
  • Questions remain over gaming performance
  • Some early adopter quirks linger
  • Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks
  • Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • Requires dedicated graphics card
  • Single-core performance lags behind competing Intel "Kaby Lake" chips
  • Chipsets don't have as many PCI Express/SATA ports as Intel's offerings
  • Gaming performance at 1080p lags behind Intel
  • At least for now
  • Horrible motherboards / BIOS
  • Feels not ready for market
  • Limited game performance
  • Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited
  • Setup complicated (memory
  • HPET
  • CCX
  • SMT
  • And power profile)
  • Overclocking barely worth it
  • Requires optimized
  • Overclocking
  • Not really cons
  • But the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 43
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • AMD sees Ryzen 7 processors as being the perfect fit for multi-threaded (nT) work with slightly lower single threaded (1T) performance. Our testing shows that is true for the most part. In applications where all cores are being used the 8-Core, 16-Thread...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net

  • From start to finish the Ryzen 7 1800X was a revelation and you can't begin to understand how happy it makes us.This isn't an AMD processor that you have to find the good points of. This isn't an incrementally better one which requires some give and take...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  For those craving some Linux gaming benchmarks from the newly-released AMD Ryzen 7 1800X processor, here are some test results. In this initial comparison are benchmarks of the Ryzen 7 1800K to Core i7 7700K when running these processors at stock speeds w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  The day many of you have been waiting for is finally here: AMD Zen (Ryzen) processors are shipping! Thanks to AMD coming around at the last minute, I received a Ryzen 7 1800X yesterday evening and have been putting it through its paces. Here is my walkthr...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com

  • Strong Overall Performance, 8-Cores / 16-Threads, Power Friendly, Aggressive Pricing
  • Issues In A Few Benchmarks, Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
  • It's not all good news, though. With some legacy apps, audio encoding, lower-res gaming, and platform level tests, Ryzen trailed Intel – sometimes by a wide margin. There is obviously still optimization work that needs to be done – from both AMD and softw...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Matt , review by: computershopper.com

  • Huge performance leap over previous-generation AMD FX processors, Trades blows with Intel's Core i7-6900K at half the price, Very price-aggressive motherboard options
  • Requires dedicated graphics card, Single-core performance lags behind competing Intel "Kaby Lake" chips, Chipsets don't have as many PCI Express/SATA ports as Intel's offerings, Gaming performance at 1080p lags behind Intel, at least for now
  • With the $499 Ryzen 7 1800X, AMD makes a Godzilla-size step back into the battle for consumer-CPU supremacy. We measured speeds on par with Intel chips that cost twice as much. Plus, the chipset/motherboard platform packs most of the features we want, at...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Any of the Ryzen 7 series processors will be fine for whatever you want to do with it. Even the cheapest of them all (the Ryzen 7 1700) which we have not reviewed but hopefully will test in the coming weeks, will offer you a nice gaming experience and the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-02, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Great value. Smooth gaming with strong minimum frame rates. Powerful productivity performance. Runs cool
  • Not really cons, but the few areas where Ryzen fell short of Intel were gaming performance and power consumption. Not great overclockers

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-10-30, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Abstract:  I'm going to start this article off with a simple number: five. Not only is that the number of months it has taken AMD to effectively turn the x86 processor world on its ear, but that's also the number of distinct model families that they've introduced...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Looking back at how things played out over the course of this review, I have no doubt it will be one of the most hotly debated articles that I've written in the last few months, maybe even the last year. There's no denying that the Zen architecture has pr...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 43 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 43   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×