Testseek.com have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100266
The editors liked
Excellent Price
Improved "Piledriver" Cores
AMD Turbo Core 3.0
Improved latencies compared to FX8150
4GHz out of the box (4.2GHz with Turbo Core)
Unlocked
5GHz Overclockable
Excellent Multi-threading Performance
Very Reasonable Price
Strong Overclocking Potential
Best OEM Cooler Available
Improved performance and power consumption over previous generation products.
Reasonably priced
Appreciable performance improvements with multicore-optimized software
Compatible with older AMD socket and motherboards
Good Performance
Decent Overclocker
Improved Efficiency
Easy Upgrade For Existing AMD Owners
Lower priced processor and cheaper motherboards
An overall performer with decent scores in almost all benchmarks should be sufficient reasons to get the AMD FX-8350
Designed for overclocking
This processor really does double up on clock speeds without
Eight cores and 5GHz on your desktop computer
Officially supports DDR31866 memory
Better performance than Intel on multithreaded tasks
An FX system has 38 usable PCIE lanes as opposed to the 24 lanes of a Sandy Bridge system
Excellent price/performance ratio
Finally competitive with Intel in the $200 CPU range
Excellent affordability versus computing power
Low platform price
NEW Piledriver CPU core design
Improved "Per Clock" performance
Compatible with existing AM3+ products
The editors didn't like
Power consumption and temperatures have been improved but still high
Lack Luster Single Threaded Performance
Still lags Intel in important areas like gaming
Still lags behind in single-core tests
Uses much more power than comparable Intel chips
Which also have on-chip graphics
Dated Platform
Intel CPUs Still Clearly Faster
Outdated technology that does not match up to latest generation of processors from Intel
Eats a lot of power in stock configuration and naturally heats up when overclocked
With Ryzen 5 coming out shortly
The 8350 might just have breathed its last
Shou
Single core performance still lags far behind Intel
Few programs use new FX instructions like fused multiplyadd
So the full performance potential remains untapped
Same maximum TDP as previous products
Perhaps a bit late to the market. It still uses 32nm while Intel is on 22nm
Higher power consumption than Intel products
"Low" but adequate single-threaded performance will not appeal to some
AMD ha mejorado su procesador de gama alta sin necesidad de grandes cambios de arquitectura ni tan siquiera de proceso de fabricación pero los trenes se le escapan cada vez mas rápido y aunque esta guerra de los procesadores de grandes rendimiento par...
Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Julio , review by: ozeros.com
Abstract: Ha pasado un poco más de un año desde que AMD lanzara sus primeros procesadores FX de 8 núcleos. En ese tiempo transcurrido, la marca ha podido optimizar la arquitectura para darle un refresco hoy, con el lanzamiento del FX-8350, el primer CPU con 8 núcle...
La primera generación de procesadores AMD FX nos dejó un sabor agridulce, eran procesadores potentes pero dejaban qué desear en algunos aspectos…1 año después AMD ha decidido renovar esta gama de procesadores con 4 nuevos modelos: FX-8350, FX-8320, FX-...
Luego de pasar por nuestras pruebas, podemos concluir que este procesador tiene un gran rendimiento y una reducción de temperaturas obtenidas por el cambio del cooler, aún utilizando la pasta térmica que viene pre-aplicada en los coolers, las cuales siemp...
Los juegos reales no reflejan las diferencias de rendimiento observadas en el test sintético 3DMark (2013); pues a su calidad máxima el mayor peso de la ejecución recae en la tarjeta de video, motivo por el que se observan pocas diferencias en el rendi...
Promediando los resultados, de los que eliminaremos los test de Truecrypt a fin de que no alteren demasiado el promedio (debido a su unidad AES dedicada), tenemos que el microprocesador AMD FX-8350 supera por un 14.28% al FX-8150 (entre 5.88% a 27.72% ...
Abstract: En juin 2006, Intel abandonnait sa tant décriée microarchitecture Netburst pour lancer Core, renonçant dès lors à la course à la fréquence au profit de l'efficacité pour un résultat que l'on connait : jamais le fondeur n'a depuis cédé le trône des perform...
