us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

The editors liked

  • Incredible Multi Threaded Performance
  • Excellent Price/Performance Ratio
  • Smooth Working Turbo Core For Speed Boost
  • Dual Turbo Modes For Increased Boost In Lightly Threaded Apps
  • Maintains Excellent Temps At Stock Speeds
  • Black Edition With Unlocked Multiplier
  • Eight Physical Cores
  • Easily Achieves High Overclocks
  • Excellent OC Performance Scaling
  • Easily Tweaked With AOD For Maximum Performan
  • Performance in highly threaded programs
  • Overclocking
  • Good MT Performance
  • 8-Cores
  • 32nm Process
  • Fairly Overclockable
  • Affordably Priced
  • Excellent multithreaded performance
  • Attractive price
  • Unlocked multiplier for simplified overclocking
  • First consumer eightcore processor
  • Officially supports 4GHzplus turbo speeds and DDR31866 memory
  • An FX system has 42 PCIE lanes as opposed to the 24 lanes of a Sandy Bridge system
  • 990FX chipset supports NVIDIA SLI. Finally
  • AMD finally has a 32nm processor with good overclocking
  • Modular and versatile architecture
  • Great performance in multithreaded applications
  • Great overclocking potential
  • Eight-core processing for under $250
  • Speedy for the price with multi-threaded software
  • Unlocked for overclocking

The editors didn't like

  • Performance In Single Threaded Apps Not On Par With Multithreaded
  • Gold
  • Discuss this review in our forums
  • Single core performance
  • Consumed More Power Than 45nm Phenom II
  • Intel Still Offers Better Overall Performance and Power
  • Questionable Single Thread Performance
  • Not always faster than competing Intel or AMD CPUs
  • Sluggish with multi-threaded workloads
  • High power usage under load
  • No integrated graphics
  • May require new motherboard
  • Windows 8 required for some features
  • Requires a new Socket AM3 motherboard
  • Single core performance has remained static
  • Full performance requires Windows 8 system and applications that use its new instructions
  • Overall similar performance to Core i5 2500K
  • But at a higher price
  • General performance below expectations
  • And rival products
  • High power consumption under load
  • Compared to Intel's chips
  • Not the best choice for hardcore gamers
  • Slower than cheaper chips in tests with single-threaded apps
  • New AM3+ socket demands new motherboard

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 13 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-01-13, review by: insidehardware.it

  • Abstract:  Advanced Micro Devices è il secondo produttore mondiale di micro-processori nonchè secondo produttore di chip grafici. La sua sede principale è a Sunnyvale, in California, mentre gli stabilimenti produttivi sono quelli di GlobalFroundies per le CPU, e...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-30, review by: tomshw.it

  • Abstract:  Usare l'energia in modo efficiente oggi non è solamente un messaggio ambientalista, è anche una questione pratica che riguarda tanti appassionati stanchi di computer che consumano 300 watt e oltre . La questione è ampia e include soprattutto i produttori ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-21, review by: bitcity.it

  • Buone prestazioni generali, ottime possibilità di overclock, buona flessibilità d'impiego in ambiente multitasking, prezzo interessante.
  • ProPerformance non brillanti in ambienti scarsamente parallelizzati, rapporto potenza/consumo migliorabile.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(89%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-31, review by: hdblog.it

  • Le nostre prove condotte sull’ FX-8150 non hanno mostrato un sostanziale cambio di rotta rispetto ai primi test che erano circolati sulle nuove CPU AMD. Alcuni addetti ai lavori hanno addirittura gridato al flop, ma a nostro avviso la piattaforma FX pu...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: hwupgrade.it

  • Abstract:  L'attesa per il debutto dei primi processori AMD basati su architettura Bulldozer è stata a dir poco lunga, sicuramente molto più di quanto AMD avesse inizialmente stimato e in seguito, con il passare dei mesi, sperato. L'architettura Bulldozer, che si...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: hwlegend.com

  • AMD si piazza di diritto al centro dell'attenzione con una CPU che può essere considerata il top sia per il mercato Mainstream che quello Enthusiast, categoria constituita da gamers e overclockers, e su cui ha investito pesantemente nel rapporto Potenza d...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: pctuner.net

  • Dato il carico di aspettative che questo lancio si porta dietro sarebbe intellettualmente disonesto chiudere l’articolo senza analizzare la nuova famiglia FX da un punto di vista tecnico, strategico e commerciale.Parlando di tecnica, l’FX-8150 nasce co...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: nexthardware.com

  • L’architettura “Bulldozer” porta con sé luci ed ombre sulla lineup di prodotti AMD.Se da un lato abbiamo una CPU dotata di otto core fisici, dall'altro la potenza di calcolo di ogni singolo core risulta meno elevata di quella delle CPU Phenom II tenta...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-09-29, Author: Peripherie , review by: ht4u.net

  • Nicht ganz im Zeitplan, doch letztlich final, bringt Intel die Prozessoren in 14-nm-Technik auf den Weg. Dabei darf Generation 5 der Core-Familie als Pflichtdarbietung betrachtet werden, und Generation 6 soll letzten Endes die Kür darstellen.Blickt man...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-06-02, review by: hifitest.de

  • Abstract:  In Sachen Videobearbeitung kommen Handbrake als auch MainConcept zum Einsatz, die verschiedene Codecs mit unterschiedlichen Qualitätseinstellungen verwenden. Quelldatei ist stets ein 380 MByte großes HD-Video. Während bisher vorwiegend Software zum Einsatz kam, die keinen Gebrauch von mehreren Kernen gemacht hat, sind MainConcept und Handbrake zwei Paradebeispiele für Parallelisierung...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 13 of 23 « Previous   1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×