us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Good Buy September 2015
September 2015
 
(82%)
162 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 162

The editors liked

  • Exceptionally powerful for a 6-inch
  • Air-cooled card
  • Easily outperforms any similarly sized Nvidia card currently available
  • Impressive power
  • Given its 6-inch size and air cooling
  • Outperforms similarly sized graphics cards
  • Mini-ITX-friendly form factor
  • Good Performance
  • Tiny Form Factor
  • Cool and Quiet
  • Power Efficient (Relatively Speaking)
  • Performance
  • Small form factor
  • Power consumption
  • Dead silent
  • Extremely compact
  • Power efficient
  • Dual BIOS
  • Support for AMD FreeSync
  • Supports AMD Virtual Super Resolution and Framerate Target Control
  • Measuring a mere 6" long
  • The R9 Nano brings 4K gaming performance to cases where the Fury X can't fit and it exceeds the GTX 980 Ti in efficiency.
  • Excellent at Full HD and 1440p resolutions
  • Very low power consumption
  • Relatively quiet
  • Fiji chip architecture
  • Compact design
  • Simpler air cooling
  • Compact
  • Quiet
  • Tiny
  • Efficient
  • Did we say small?
  • Condensed Milk

The editors didn't like

  • Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti perform better overall for about the same price
  • Lack of HDMI 2.0 support makes the card a tricky fit for gaming on a 4K HDTV
  • High cost means the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti are better options for the same price if you don't need the small size
  • Lacks HDMI 2
  • 0
  • Not Quite As Fast As A Fury
  • Premium Pricing
  • Inductor Noise
  • No HDMI 2.0
  • Price
  • Very expensive
  • No HDMI 2.0 support
  • Coil noise
  • Average clock speed well below advertised 1000 MHz
  • Fan doesn't turn off in idle
  • Complicated overclocking
  • No backplate
  • For the same $650
  • The GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X are a bit faster. Coil noise is an issue on our sample and on high the fan isn't particularly quiet either. It is 2015 where is the HDMI 2.0 support?
  • Not really a 4K GPU
  • Too expensive for its specs
  • Cheaper GPUs deliver the same capabilities
  • Expensive
  • Not as fast as larger GPUs
  • 4GB VRAM
  • Niche
  • Sour Milk

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 17
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2019-01-27, Author: Tim , review by: techspot.com

  • Well I have to say that although I haven't had a chance to check out the multiplayer action yet, I was pleasantly surprised with what I found in the beta experience of Destiny 2...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-31, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Well I have to say that although I haven't had a chance to check out the multiplayer action yet, I was pleasantly surprised with what I found in the beta experience of Destiny 2. The game looks great, plays well and it's already significantly more polishe...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-08-24, Author: Jarred , review by: pcgamer.com

  • Condensed Milk: Compact; quiet; tiny; efficient; did we say small?
  • Sour Milk: Expensive; not as fast as larger GPUs; 4GB VRAM; niche
  • The R9 Nano is the fastest GPU ever crammed into Mini-ITX motherboard dimensions, but youll pay extra for the small size...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2016-05-27, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  Though there are still some hotly anticipated titles due in 2016, we might already have the game of the year on our hands. Overwatch has been on our radar for a while now but it recently blew up in a big way with an open beta that attracted over 9 million...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-05-15, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  Twenty two years ago an obscure game developer called id Software released a first-person shooter that would have a huge impact on the future of PC gaming, computer graphics and the industry as a whole, that game was Doom. At the time I was 10, and while...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-02-29, Author: Matthew , review by: pcmag.com

  • Impressive power, given its 6-inch size and air cooling, Outperforms similarly sized graphics cards, Mini-ITX-friendly form factor
  • High cost means the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti are better options for the same price if you don't need the small size, Lacks HDMI 2,0
  • The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is the most powerful mini-ITX-friendly graphics card available. But unless you need the form factor, you can find better performance for the price...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-01-13, Author: Christopher , review by: gamecrate.com

  • Abstract:  AMD's Radeon R9 Nano graphics card is getting a significant price cut for the new year. The R9 Nano, previously marketed at $649, has dropped to a $500 base price, a significant level of savings for one of AMD's flagships and one of the only cards on the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-01-12, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Abstract:  When the AMD Radeon R9 Nano graphics card received a price cut yesterday we were excited about it as the third card based on AMD's Flagship Fiji GPU core was frankly overpriced and AMD was hoping that people were willing to pay a premium to have a small c...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-11-02, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • What does our little experiment tell us - is the Radeon R9 Nano the perfect GPU for everyone? Clearly not. Unless you have a system build or a custom mod that you want to do that requires the small size of the Nano's 6-in PCB, you are better off with anot...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-09-22, Author: Stephen , review by: 4k.com

  • Excellent at Full HD and 1440p resolutions, Very low power consumption, Relatively quiet, Fiji chip architecture, Compact design, Simpler air cooling
  • Not really a 4K GPU, Too expensive for its specs, Cheaper GPUs deliver the same capabilities
  • The Radeon R9 Nano has a lot of value to offer for gamers who want compact design and high performance at Full HD and 1440p resolutions, but there are also both cheaper non-4K GPUs that deliver nearly the same quality of gameplay for a lower price and tr...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(79%)
    page 1 of 17 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 17   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×