us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Good Buy September 2015
September 2015
 
(82%)
162 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 162

The editors liked

  • Exceptionally powerful for a 6-inch
  • Air-cooled card
  • Easily outperforms any similarly sized Nvidia card currently available
  • Impressive power
  • Given its 6-inch size and air cooling
  • Outperforms similarly sized graphics cards
  • Mini-ITX-friendly form factor
  • Good Performance
  • Tiny Form Factor
  • Cool and Quiet
  • Power Efficient (Relatively Speaking)
  • Performance
  • Small form factor
  • Power consumption
  • Dead silent
  • Extremely compact
  • Power efficient
  • Dual BIOS
  • Support for AMD FreeSync
  • Supports AMD Virtual Super Resolution and Framerate Target Control
  • Measuring a mere 6" long
  • The R9 Nano brings 4K gaming performance to cases where the Fury X can't fit and it exceeds the GTX 980 Ti in efficiency.
  • Excellent at Full HD and 1440p resolutions
  • Very low power consumption
  • Relatively quiet
  • Fiji chip architecture
  • Compact design
  • Simpler air cooling
  • Compact
  • Quiet
  • Tiny
  • Efficient
  • Did we say small?
  • Condensed Milk

The editors didn't like

  • Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti perform better overall for about the same price
  • Lack of HDMI 2.0 support makes the card a tricky fit for gaming on a 4K HDTV
  • High cost means the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti are better options for the same price if you don't need the small size
  • Lacks HDMI 2
  • 0
  • Not Quite As Fast As A Fury
  • Premium Pricing
  • Inductor Noise
  • No HDMI 2.0
  • Price
  • Very expensive
  • No HDMI 2.0 support
  • Coil noise
  • Average clock speed well below advertised 1000 MHz
  • Fan doesn't turn off in idle
  • Complicated overclocking
  • No backplate
  • For the same $650
  • The GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X are a bit faster. Coil noise is an issue on our sample and on high the fan isn't particularly quiet either. It is 2015 where is the HDMI 2.0 support?
  • Not really a 4K GPU
  • Too expensive for its specs
  • Cheaper GPUs deliver the same capabilities
  • Expensive
  • Not as fast as larger GPUs
  • 4GB VRAM
  • Niche
  • Sour Milk

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 17 of 17
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-08-24, review by: cardmanhinh.com

  • Abstract:  Công ty nào cũng có vài bí mật riêng mà chỉ nội bộ biết trước khi thiên hạ biết. AMD cũng thế trước khi card màn hình AMD Radeon R9 Nano được chính thức phát hành ra thị trường thì họ cũng sẽ có 1 vài bản báo cáo gì đó về hiệu năng, về hình dáng cho nhân...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2015-11-18, Author: 04ahgy , review by: prohardver.hu

  • Az összes játékban elért eredmény alapján a Radeon R9 Nano nagyjából 2%-kal gyorsabb az R9 Fury-nél, míg az R9 Fury X-től is csak kevéssel marad el, hisz utóbbi előnye csupán 7%. A GTX 980-at nagyjából 15%-kal utasította maga mögé ellenben a GTX 980 Ti 1...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 17 of 17 « Previous   1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×