us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Good Buy September 2015
September 2015
 
(82%)
162 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 162

The editors liked

  • Exceptionally powerful for a 6-inch
  • Air-cooled card
  • Easily outperforms any similarly sized Nvidia card currently available
  • Impressive power
  • Given its 6-inch size and air cooling
  • Outperforms similarly sized graphics cards
  • Mini-ITX-friendly form factor
  • Good Performance
  • Tiny Form Factor
  • Cool and Quiet
  • Power Efficient (Relatively Speaking)
  • Performance
  • Small form factor
  • Power consumption
  • Dead silent
  • Extremely compact
  • Power efficient
  • Dual BIOS
  • Support for AMD FreeSync
  • Supports AMD Virtual Super Resolution and Framerate Target Control
  • Measuring a mere 6" long
  • The R9 Nano brings 4K gaming performance to cases where the Fury X can't fit and it exceeds the GTX 980 Ti in efficiency.
  • Excellent at Full HD and 1440p resolutions
  • Very low power consumption
  • Relatively quiet
  • Fiji chip architecture
  • Compact design
  • Simpler air cooling
  • Compact
  • Quiet
  • Tiny
  • Efficient
  • Did we say small?
  • Condensed Milk

The editors didn't like

  • Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti perform better overall for about the same price
  • Lack of HDMI 2.0 support makes the card a tricky fit for gaming on a 4K HDTV
  • High cost means the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti are better options for the same price if you don't need the small size
  • Lacks HDMI 2
  • 0
  • Not Quite As Fast As A Fury
  • Premium Pricing
  • Inductor Noise
  • No HDMI 2.0
  • Price
  • Very expensive
  • No HDMI 2.0 support
  • Coil noise
  • Average clock speed well below advertised 1000 MHz
  • Fan doesn't turn off in idle
  • Complicated overclocking
  • No backplate
  • For the same $650
  • The GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X are a bit faster. Coil noise is an issue on our sample and on high the fan isn't particularly quiet either. It is 2015 where is the HDMI 2.0 support?
  • Not really a 4K GPU
  • Too expensive for its specs
  • Cheaper GPUs deliver the same capabilities
  • Expensive
  • Not as fast as larger GPUs
  • 4GB VRAM
  • Niche
  • Sour Milk

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 17
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality. The background 'buzz' on our sample is a concern, but in terms of the overall cooling assembly, it works very well - the Nano...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Stuart_Davidson , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • A product which pushes boundaries… sometimes too far. Not cheap but for certain consumers who want to work around its issues this will be a product which brings new performance levels to small form factor systems...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Best SFF performance, True innovation, Lots more perf with OC, HBM memory, Looks the business
  • Clear coil whine on sample, No overclocking on memory, No HDMI 2.0
  • AMD most likely understands that it won't have clear consumer GPU performance leadership in this round of launches, with the GeForce GTX Titan X and partner-clocked GTX 980 Tis holding a reasonable advantage at a 4K resolution.But winning the hearts...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Igor , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Enthusiasts fond of space-saving gaming PCs have dreamed of a graphics card that runs as fast as a factory-overclocked Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 at Full HD resolution, and even faster at Ultra HD, while being smaller, lighter and even a bit less power hungry...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • AMD's R9 Nano is, at first glance, precariously placed in the market with its $649 MSRP that makes it as expensive as both the Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti, both of which perform considerably better. However, the price-to-performance perspectiv...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net

  • Brings new levels of performance to the SFF graphics card market, Comfortably outperforms other SFF offerings (GTX 970 and R9 380), Capable of playable 4K performance, Cooling solution keeps the GPU temperatures in line, Cooling solution is not loud enoug
  • Retail price is significantly above its closest performance competitor (the GTX 980), Cooler design exhausts some air directly into the chassis, Rear components can get hot and there is no backplate, No native HDMI 2.0
  • The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is a unique graphics card in many ways. It utilises a flagship GPU but houses it on a board which measures in at six inches long to make it a true mITX graphics card.As far as small form factor graphics cards go, AMD has comfortably...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-04, Author: CHIPTeam , review by: chip.com.my

  • Size, Performance
  • None
  • The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is a godsend piece of hardware for builders of SFF computers, providing performance of high-end graphic cards all in a small package. If you're a SFF enthusiast it's perfect for any kind of build, and even if you're not the R9 Nano...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-01-02, Author: goldfries , review by: goldfries.com

  • AMD Radeon R9 Nano retails at RM 3,300 onwards of which I think it's crazy considering that's the price of an Nvidia GTX 980 Ti card that delivers more performance, 50% more than an R9 390X and the GTX 980 cards, and nearly double the price of Nvidia GTX...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-09-30, Author: John , review by: hardwarezone.com.my

  • Extremely compact size makes it ideal for miniITX builds, Performs better than an R9 290X 8GB, Only needs a single 8pin PCIe power connector, Capable of supporting games in 4K resolution
  • Limited overclocking headroom
  • AMD has gotten off to a good start with the Radeon R9 Nano, but it's still a little too early for the company to be celebrating. The HBM memory format is still in its infancy stage of the distribution and development cycle, and with AMD's overclocking res...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-25, Author: Koh , review by: hardwarezone.com.sg

  • Abstract:  We're now at that point of limbo in the graphics product cycle where consumers are already looking ahead to the next generation of cards from both red and green camps . There's a lot to be excited about for the upcoming batch of GPUs, and the news pipelin...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 17 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 17   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×