us.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded July 2015
July 2015
 
(79%)
266 Reviews
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
79 0 100 266

The editors liked

  • Excellent Price
  • Improved "Piledriver" Cores
  • AMD Turbo Core 3.0
  • Improved latencies compared to FX8150
  • 4GHz out of the box (4.2GHz with Turbo Core)
  • Unlocked
  • 5GHz Overclockable
  • Excellent Multi-threading Performance
  • Very Reasonable Price
  • Strong Overclocking Potential
  • Best OEM Cooler Available
  • Improved performance and power consumption over previous generation products.
  • Reasonably priced
  • Appreciable performance improvements with multicore-optimized software
  • Compatible with older AMD socket and motherboards
  • Good Performance
  • Decent Overclocker
  • Improved Efficiency
  • Easy Upgrade For Existing AMD Owners
  • Lower priced processor and cheaper motherboards
  • An overall performer with decent scores in almost all benchmarks should be sufficient reasons to get the AMD FX-8350
  • Designed for overclocking
  • This processor really does double up on clock speeds without
  • Eight cores and 5GHz on your desktop computer
  • Officially supports DDR31866 memory
  • Better performance than Intel on multithreaded tasks
  • An FX system has 38 usable PCIE lanes as opposed to the 24 lanes of a Sandy Bridge system
  • Excellent price/performance ratio
  • Finally competitive with Intel in the $200 CPU range
  • Excellent affordability versus computing power
  • Low platform price
  • NEW Piledriver CPU core design
  • Improved "Per Clock" performance
  • Compatible with existing AM3+ products

The editors didn't like

  • Power consumption and temperatures have been improved but still high
  • Lack Luster Single Threaded Performance
  • Still lags Intel in important areas like gaming
  • Still lags behind in single-core tests
  • Uses much more power than comparable Intel chips
  • Which also have on-chip graphics
  • Dated Platform
  • Intel CPUs Still Clearly Faster
  • Outdated technology that does not match up to latest generation of processors from Intel
  • Eats a lot of power in stock configuration and naturally heats up when overclocked
  • With Ryzen 5 coming out shortly
  • The 8350 might just have breathed its last
  • Shou
  • Single core performance still lags far behind Intel
  • Few programs use new FX instructions like fused multiplyadd
  • So the full performance potential remains untapped
  • Same maximum TDP as previous products
  • Perhaps a bit late to the market. It still uses 32nm while Intel is on 22nm
  • Higher power consumption than Intel products
  • "Low" but adequate single-threaded performance will not appeal to some

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 26 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-12-05, review by: coolenjoy.net

  • Abstract:  이 글을 읽으러 여기까지 와주신 분들께 감사하단 말을 제일 먼저 전합니다. 그리고 예정보다 글이 늦어져 죄송하단 말도 함께 드리겠습니다. 원래 11월 중에, 실상 11월 초에 올렸어야 했던 글이 지연에 지연을 거듭하다 마침내 예정을 한달이나 넘긴 오늘에야 탈고해 여러분께 보여드릴 수 있게 되었습니다. 뭐, 사실 지금 당장은 저로써도 보고 싶던 글이 마침내 완성된 것이라 누구보다 기쁠 따름입니다만.ㅎㅎ사실 BEST CPU FOR GAMERS라는 타이틀만...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-11-07, review by: coolenjoy.net

  • Abstract:  AMD FX-9590/ 9370/ 8370E/ 8350/ 8300 벤치마크제품 소개 및 벤치마크 구성AMD FX 시리즈 CPU가 좋으냐 인텔 코어 i 시리즈 CPU가 좋으냐 하는 것은 FX 시리즈가 발매된 후 지금까지 이어지는 케케묵은 논쟁이다.

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-10-19, review by: coolenjoy.net

  • Abstract:  이번 달에도 변함없이 BEST CPU FOR GAMERS 연재를 계속하게 됐단 뿌듯함을 전하기 앞서, 10월이 이미 한참 지나서야 10월호를 업데이트하게 된 점 너그러이 양해를 구하는 바입니다. 이번 달은 지난 달에 비해 새로 추가된 제품도, 러닝 체인지가 이뤄진 라인업도 없어 그냥 한 달을 건너 뛸까-_-; 하는 생각까지 했었지만... 이 글을 읽어 주시는 분들이 여러 경로를 통해 전달한, 한 개의 미션이 제 머릿속을 떠나지 않았습니다. 무엇인고 하니...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-14, review by: coolenjoy.net

  • Abstract:  이번 달에도 어김없이 BEST CPU FOR GAMERS 글을 올리게 되어 무엇보다 기쁜 마음이 앞서는 순간입니다. 다들 이미 알고 계시겠지만 지난 달 말 인텔은 코어 i7 5900/5800 시리즈를 발표하며 하스웰-E를 데스크탑 시장에 소개한 바 있습니다. 그리고 그 후 1~2주간은 처음 선보인 하스웰-E의 벤치마크 자료들로 인터넷이 범람할 지경이었습니다. 그 대열에 저도 참가할 수 있었더라면 좋았겠지만 아쉽게도 그러진 못했고, 대신 운 좋게도 리테일...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-30, Author: 페일 , review by: firewheel.co.kr

  • Abstract:  인텔 쿼드코어 i5- 4690과 AMD 옥타코어 fx-8350 비교입니다.AMD 옥타코어는 업글하면서 심각하게 고민했던 제품입니다. 결국은 AMD 씨퓨를 포기하고 그냥 인텔 하위기종 cpu로 업글했습니다만.아래 벤치마크 자료를 보면 싱글, 듀어 코어를 사용하는 환경에서는 인텔 i5-4690이 훨씬 앞서고 멀티코어 환경에서는 amd fx 8350이 앞섭니다.하지만 코어 갯수가 두배인 것을 감안하면 듀얼코어 환경에서 생각보다 fx 8350이 빠르지 않다는 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-15, Author: P-wares , review by: playwares.com

  • Abstract:  AMD, INTEL CPU 8종 게임성능벤치마크 안녕하세요. 플웨즈 이은광입니다. 이번에 플웨즈에서는 AMD와 인텔CPU를 통해 그동안 벤치마크가 이루어진 게임으로 CPU의 성능을 간단하게 비교테스트를 진행했습니다. 게임에 따라 해상도마다 CPU에 주는 부하가 다른만큼 대부분 2560X1600해상도, 1920X1080해상도에서 테스트...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: NAMEGT , review by: playwares.com

  • Conclusion     AMD Vishera FX-8350 Black Edition 는.....  테스트 결과,  FX-8350(비셰라)은 FX-8150(불도저)과 비교하여,싱글코어 / 멀티코어 약 7~10% 향상된 성능을 보여주었으며, 7~10%의 소비전력은 감소된 결과를 보였습니다.  오버클럭폭 자체는 불도저에 비해 크게 나아졌다고 볼 수 없으나  높아진 IPC,낮아진 전력소모,  출시예정가격이 23만원대로 기본 상태(Default)에서 INTE...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: ㄷㄱ , review by: playwares.com

  • 지금까지 살펴본 결과를 토대로, 우선 "FX-8350"이란 모델 자체의 포지션을 분석해 보겠습니다.8350은 8150의 자리를 대체할 것이 확실시되는데, 과연 8150 대비 기본 스펙상의 성능은 얼마나 올랐을까요?  ...별도의 설명이 필요한가요? :-)(죄송, 밤새 테스트를 한 끝이라 언어 감각이 실종되고 있습니다 -_-;)...FX-8350이라는 '모델' 자체의 성능과 별개의 문제로, 파일드라이버 아키텍처의 경쟁력은 과연 어떠할까요?'스펙상 기본 클...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-08-10, review by: buycoms.com

  • ประสิทธิภาพสูงน่าใช้งานจริงๆ สำหรับคนที่ต้องการเล่นเกม

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-31, Author: Venom-Crusher , review by: vmodtech.com

  • …ก็มาถึงบทสรุปของการทดสอบซีพียู AMD UNLCOKED FX PROCESSOR FX-8350 ตัวนี้กันแล้วนะครับ ก็ขอบอกว่าเป็นซีพียู AMD ที่ออกสเป็คมาเอาใจแฟนคลับได้อย่างถูกใจเลยครับ ทั้ง CPU Core ที่มีเยอะถึง 8 คอร์มากที่สุดในเดสก์ท็อปซีพียูที่มีจำหน่ายในท้องตลาดขณะนี้ อีกทั้งควา...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 26 of 27 « Previous   1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×