Testseek.com have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
September 2015
(82%)
162 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
820100162
The editors liked
Exceptionally powerful for a 6-inch
Air-cooled card
Easily outperforms any similarly sized Nvidia card currently available
Impressive power
Given its 6-inch size and air cooling
Outperforms similarly sized graphics cards
Mini-ITX-friendly form factor
Good Performance
Tiny Form Factor
Cool and Quiet
Power Efficient (Relatively Speaking)
Performance
Small form factor
Power consumption
Dead silent
Extremely compact
Power efficient
Dual BIOS
Support for AMD FreeSync
Supports AMD Virtual Super Resolution and Framerate Target Control
Measuring a mere 6" long
The R9 Nano brings 4K gaming performance to cases where the Fury X can't fit and it exceeds the GTX 980 Ti in efficiency.
Excellent at Full HD and 1440p resolutions
Very low power consumption
Relatively quiet
Fiji chip architecture
Compact design
Simpler air cooling
Compact
Quiet
Tiny
Efficient
Did we say small?
Condensed Milk
The editors didn't like
Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti perform better overall for about the same price
Lack of HDMI 2.0 support makes the card a tricky fit for gaming on a 4K HDTV
High cost means the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti are better options for the same price if you don't need the small size
Lacks HDMI 2
0
Not Quite As Fast As A Fury
Premium Pricing
Inductor Noise
No HDMI 2.0
Price
Very expensive
No HDMI 2.0 support
Coil noise
Average clock speed well below advertised 1000 MHz
Fan doesn't turn off in idle
Complicated overclocking
No backplate
For the same $650
The GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X are a bit faster. Coil noise is an issue on our sample and on high the fan isn't particularly quiet either. It is 2015 where is the HDMI 2.0 support?
